Was life better in the past
This is a model answer written to show what a Band 7 response looks like against the marking criteria. It is a worked example, not a graded submission. To see your own band, paste your writing into the free checker.
The prompt
Some people believe that life was better in the past, while others think that the quality of life is higher today. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Band 7 model answer (258 words)
People often disagree about whether earlier generations enjoyed a better life than we do now. Some look back fondly on a slower, more connected past, while others point to the comfort and opportunity of modern living. I believe life today is better overall, even though something real has been lost.
Those who prefer the past argue that communities were closer and daily life was less stressful. Neighbours knew one another, families ate together, and people were not interrupted every few minutes by messages and notifications. Work also tended to stay at the workplace, so evenings genuinely belonged to family and rest. For many, this sense of belonging mattered more than material comfort.
Supporters of modern life respond that nostalgia hides how hard the past actually was. Medical care was limited, many children did not finish school, and ordinary tasks such as washing clothes consumed entire days. Today most people live longer, travel further and choose from careers their grandparents could never have imagined. A woman in many countries can now study, work and vote in ways that were once denied to her.
In my view, the second position is stronger because its benefits are measurable rather than remembered. Longer lives, wider education and greater freedom outweigh the loss of some community spirit, and nothing prevents us from rebuilding that spirit deliberately, through local clubs or simply switching our phones off.
In conclusion, while the past offered a warmth that modern society sometimes lacks, the health, education and choices available today make the present the better time to live.
Why this reaches Band 7
-
Task Response
Both views get a full paragraph of genuine development, and the writer's opinion is stated in the introduction and argued for on its own terms ("measurable rather than remembered") instead of simply repeating one side.
-
Coherence and Cohesion
One view per paragraph, with natural signposting such as "Those who prefer the past" and "Supporters of modern life respond" rather than mechanical linkers.
-
Lexical Resource
Less common items like "look back fondly", "nostalgia hides" and "community spirit" are used precisely, and topic vocabulary stays natural throughout.
-
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Confident complex sentences, including concession ("even though something real has been lost") and relative clauses, with only rare slips.
The one fix to reach Band 7
Band 6 answers to this question usually describe both eras without ever weighing them against each other. The single change that reaches Band 7 is to give a reason WHY one view is stronger, as this essay does by contrasting measurable benefits with remembered ones.
Now check your own answer.
Paste your own attempt at this prompt and Examinerly names the single criterion keeping you below your target band, and shows the sentence-level fix. We never inflate your band.
Check your writing free